Recent decisions by the U.S. appeals court have emphasized the crucial role of human authorship in copyright eligibility, rejecting copyright claims for art generated solely by artificial intelligence. These rulings highlight a pressing issue as AI continues to evolve in creative fields, raising questions about plagiarism and copyright protections. Legal experts are calling for solutions to safeguard creators amid the rise of generative AI, while discussions around the implications of AI on intellectual property law intensify. The D.C. Circuit specifically affirmed that without a human creator, AI-generated works cannot receive copyright protection, leading to concerns among artists and legal professionals alike. As the AI landscape expands, the need for a comprehensive legal framework becomes increasingly urgent to navigate the complexities of AI-generated content and its impact on creativity and copyright.