With recent discussions surrounding the possibility of regime change in Iran, comparisons to historical events emerge, particularly the 1953 coup orchestrated by the US. As analysts debate the implications of such actions, concern mounts over the past consequences of foreign intervention. Many articles highlight that while calls for change are gaining traction, the complexities and potential repercussions are vast. President Trump’s position remains ambiguous, with reports suggesting he is hesitant to embrace calls for regime change, reflecting a broader debate on the lessons learned from history. Furthermore, various perspectives note that any transition in Iran would likely face significant challenges and resistance, making the notion of a straightforward change in leadership overly optimistic.