The long-anticipated House v. NCAA settlement, which could signify a seismic shift in college athletics, is nearing approval but faces additional scrutiny from the presiding judge. As significant voices like gymnast Livvy Dunne testify against the $2.8 billion deal, concerns regarding roster limits and revenue sharing for athletes are at the forefront. With pivotal hearings taking place, the outcomes may redefine amateurism and financial equity across college sports. This transformative moment in athletics comes amid broader questions and adjustments related to revenue sharing and athlete compensation in a rapidly evolving landscape.